Monday, May 23, 2016

Trump mob ties

It should go without saying that any person who can credibly be connected to organized crime is not fit for office of President of the United States.

Donald Trump, the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, a great American institution, is clearly not fit for POTUS!


Trump Mob Ties

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-2016-mob-organized-crime-213910

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/17/nyregion/17trump.html?_r=0

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/trump-swam-in-mob-infested-waters-in-early-years-as-an-nyc-developer/2015/10/16/3c75b918-60a3-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Trump: why retweet of racist makes him racist

Here's a racist online, one of many that Donald Trump has retweeted:


https://twitter.com/NeilTurner_




Here's the example of Trump retweeting this and other racists.




Yet some say a retweet is just that, not an endorsement. No ill intent.


But the reality is, Donald Trump is promoting them through this retweet.
I don't know how many followers this person had before Trump retweet but today he has
over 10K.  Yet, if Trump retweets him, his message and bio gets exposed to over 7.92 million people.
Over 700 times more people!


Everybody can retweet something by mistake, but Trump did it 3-4 times.
At the time, he stood on principle and said it wasn't an endorsement, just that he liked the message.


But the question is why racists love his message and openly promote him?  And he returns the favor unknowingly?  And now that it's known, the principle is gone? Because I haven't heard of him doing these retweets anymore.  But the cynical in me says that's because the message is out, he's gotten all the benefit he can from it, and now he's trying to change the subject.


But we shouldn't let him. And after the media glare is gone, this racist is left with more followers to spew hatred and resentment.




Trump is a racist.
He is unqualified to be President just because of that alone.  Not to mention dozens of other reasons.

Sunday, May 1, 2016

Cruz could win even if Trump gets magical 1,237 delegates!

The media and #Nevertrump crowd are not thinking very open-minded about the potential Republican contested convention.  First, there's this notion that if Trump gets 1,237 delegates "won" during the primary/caucus/convention process, then he wins.  If not, then no candidate will get a majority in the first ballot of the RNC, and Ted Cruz would have a big advantage because the actual people who atre the voting delegates support him over Trump.  This would be due to the Cruz campaign doing the hard political work during the selection process that Trump neglected to do, and also because the base of the party simply supports Cruz over Trump.

But this is all actually not true!

This is what many of the elites both political and press want to be true, but they themselves report its not true if you listen close.  What they're doing is defining the process of what they will declare as legitimate.  That's why others need to counter their bias.

The truth is before the convention begins, the rules committee, made up of select delegates from each state will determine every rule for THIS YEAR'S convention!  The media is talking about prior conventions.  Usually the rules are reaffirmed each time, but this is a time when that very well might not happen.

After this committee recommends, all the delegates vote to accept the
Rules on Day 1 of the convention.  Then, the rules are set for 2016.

So as of today, THERE ARE NO RULES!

I suggest that the rules be:


1. First ballot 67% to end process and declare winner
2.  Second ballot 60% to end process and declare a winner
3.  Third ballot and beyond, 50% to win.

You might think this not democratic right? To demand a candidate get 2/3 of the delegates?  But remember, this whole process was never designed to be democratic.  Our country and the Republican Party process was designed to be REPUBLICAN or indirect democracy rather than majority rules. Thst's how we have an electoral college in the first place.  At our country's founding, the state legislators voted for our President.  As the years wore on, the process has become more transparent and democratic but not completely.  To this day, the winner of the popular vote can lose the election.

I chose 2/3 on 1st ballot because those are the thresholds we have for very important changes in our country.  A Constitutional amendment can't be passed by majority vote in Congress.  Same for over-riding a Presidentsl veto, or removal from office after impeachment.


I chose 60% on 2nd ballot because almost every major legislation in the Congress needs 60 votes to break filibuster from the minority.  Once again this is important to ensure the idea has broad support or is at least not totally objectionable to a significant minority.

Then a simple majority after that doe obvious reasons.

Realize under most normal circumstances these proposed rules changes wouldn't change much because most nominations are unanimous.  The question is what should parties do when significant numbers disagree with the leading vote getter.

This forces the leading vote getter in a contested convention to actually work hard to secure the votes of the actual people rather than an automatic delegate process.

It's said that Cruz has enough support from the delegates to win on a 2nd ballot, based on current rules.  If that's so, these delegates can write rules to make that a reality.

The media needs to recognize this as a legitimate election outcome, and get the public ready for it.
And Trump's whining.



Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Proof Ted Cruz is too extreme to be President!

Ted Cruz is one of only 2 people with a reasonable chance to be the Republican nominee for President in 2016.  What this means is that he has a real opportunity to win the general election.  Polls show him competitive with the Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton.  And while much has been made of how Donald Trump is not qualified to be Potus and would be a disaster for this country. (He would) the media is ignoring the actual details that Ted Cruz could be worse!   Sure Cruz is not vulgar and has much more discipline than Trump, but he has purposefully and skillfully advanced radical notions throughout his career.  Here's one, I think even he today would find hard to defend:

Ted Cruz advocated a person remain in jail over a decade longer than he should have based on legal errors.  This is a case where he agrees the petitioner was factually innocent of prior offenses.  And had those assertions been raised properly by the defendant or his lawyer, would only have gotten a 2 year sentence for a subsequent crime. Instead Cruz argues to preserve a procedural rule, the man should stay in jail for over ten years more.  Remember, this is not a situation where a convicted person is using legal technicalities.  All sides agree in actual innocence of a prior offense that prompted  sentence enhancer from what it should be of 2 years max to over decade for a  later crime.

Listen to the audio and you'll hear incredulous Supreme Court Justices question Cruz and how he would have a man serve an extra 10 years in prison  when all sides agree he doesn't deserve it.


DRETKE V HALEY  - March 2, 2004
 Supreme Court Audio





Sunday, March 6, 2016

Media narrative: democrats higher turnout!

In Louisiana Primary:

Democrats 306,721 total voters
Republicans 285,609 total voters

In addition, once again as in many places Hillary Clinton was the top vote-getter:

Clinton 222,216
Trump 124,818


Even though this is considered s solid red state this and many southern states could be in contention  in November because

1. if Trump wins the Republican nomination, the Republicans could splinter into pieces
2. If someone wins, his supporters could sit out or go 3rd party (maybe with him)

Donald Trump has come too far to be a non-factor. If he loses the nomination to a mainstream Republican at convention, it will have been a robbery.  Otherwise is Cruz or Rubio win somehow, he can't legitimately support them after all they've said about each other.  They've gone way too far.

So a Hillary Clinton could be super strong, and Republican can be super weak and this election could be a massive blowout!

Let's hope so!